What occurs when Californians undergo two sports activities betting initiatives?

Grace Gedye, CalMatters

In November, Californians are more likely to face the query: ought to sports activities betting be legalized?

After which, a bit of afterward their poll, there’s a good likelihood that they are going to be requested once more: ought to sports activities betting be legalized?

Sure. Two measures to legalize sports activities betting are more likely to seem on the November poll. That is in comparison with the earlier 12 months, when there have been 4 totally different initiatives within the sport.

One of many different two measures is already eligible for the vote in November and the opposite needs to be quickly.

Here’s what every initiative does

The California Sports activities Betting Regulation and Unlawful Playing Enforcement Act is supported by a bunch of Native American tribes and is at present eligible to vote. This may permit tribal casinos and the state’s 4 horse racing tracks to supply sports activities betting. It could additionally permit tribal casinos to develop their playing choices to roulette and cube.

On the identical time, the California Homelessness and Psychological Well being Options Act is supported by a number of main sports activities betting corporations, together with FanDuel, DraftKings and BetMGM. This may legalize on-line sports activities betting exterior of Native American lands and permit gaming corporations to supply on-line sports activities betting in the event that they associate with a tribe. Electoral officers will verify the signatures of this initiative – if there are sufficient, it’s going to go to the poll.

This is what occurs when each cross

California sometimes will get ballots with a number of initiatives on the identical topic.

If one goes by way of and the others do not, there isn’t a downside: what goes by way of takes impact, the others do not.

If all of them cross and don’t contradict one another, they will all take impact.

However when multiple passes and so they is within the occasion of a battle, the one who obtained the larger variety of sure votes shall take impact, and the opposite shall not. California Structure.

The initiative, supported by FanDduel, DraftKkings and BetMGM, confirms that this isn’t in battle with a measure permitting sports activities betting on tribal lands and that if each cross, each will take impact. The measure supported by the tribes says nothing about whether or not it’s in battle with different measures.

So if each initiatives undergo – and The initiative, backed by FanDuel and DraftKings, will go a great distance – each measures are more likely to take impact, mentioned Southern California lawyer Ian Imrich, whose follow additionally contains playing legislation. Nevertheless, if each cross and the tribal measure passes a larger distance, the tribal measure attorneys might argue in court docket that the 2 measures is battle with the intention to stop the entry into power of the measure supported by FanDuel and DraftKings.

Different doubling of poll papers

This isn’t the primary time that multiple initiative has been taken on the identical topic. In 2016, there have been them two initiatives associated to the dying penalty, and two per plastic bag.

Legislators may mediate transactions between proponents of the initiative. In 2014, legislators accepted the bill which allowed supporters to tug their actions nearer to the poll paper, giving them extra time to achieve an settlement. In April, for instance, legislators negotiated between affected person teams, shopper attorneys and medical professionals by adopting a legislation that will increase the penalties that victims of medical offenses can apply for and prevents a expensive battle of initiative on this subject.

In February, when 4 sports activities betting initiatives got here collectively, state legislative leaders Anthony Rendon and Toni Atkins expressed curiosity to find a compromise sports activities betting.

“I feel it is all the time complicated for voters to have a number of poll papers on the identical level,” mentioned Toni Atkins, a state senator from San Diego at an occasion within the Sacramento Press Membership. “If you wish to see progress, it will be helpful if it have been simpler, so I feel there could also be a possibility (for an settlement to be negotiated),” Atkins mentioned.

When CalMatters requested the Atkins workplace if lawmakers have been nonetheless contemplating the deal, a spokesman mentioned they have been nonetheless investigating.

How Californians really feel

The overwhelming majority of Californians assume the initiative course of wants to vary, a examine performed by the California Institute of Public Coverage in April. Greater than 90% of Caliors agreed to a point or firmly that the wording of voting measures was usually too complicated for voters to grasp what would occur when the initiative handed, and 56% mentioned that particular pursuits management a lot of the method.

Many of the initiatives is not going to work, and Mark Baldassare, president of the institute, mentioned the chance of the measure being handed can be additional decreased if voters have been confused.

The truth that the initiatives might confuse voters and additional complicate the method if there may be multiple initiative on the identical topic is “an enormous downside,” mentioned Mary-Beth Moylan, an affiliate professor on the College of the Pacific. McGeorge Faculty of Legislation.

“Individuals do not are inclined to learn issues rigorously. And infrequently what’s on the poll is undeniably deceptive,” Moylan mentioned. “It is particularly harmful when you’ve a number of initiatives on the identical or an analogous subject.”


Because of CapRadio, you’ve a dependable information supply. As a non-profit, donations from individuals such as you assist the press, which permits us to find essential tales for our viewers. For those who imagine in what we do and assist our mission, please donate right now.


Donate right now

Leave a Comment

A note to our visitors

This website has updated its privacy policy in compliance with changes to European Union data protection law, for all members globally. We’ve also updated our Privacy Policy to give you more information about your rights and responsibilities with respect to your privacy and personal information. Please read this to review the updates about which cookies we use and what information we collect on our site. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our updated privacy policy.